Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rabid Snarbolax"
From SpiralKnights
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
The current page looks like it is almost a direct copy of the regular [[Snarbolax]] page. If no one who's fought these guys wants to do a decent write-up, I think it would be less misleading to have no information than to have an explanation that doesn't mention that silkwing (and other new elements, whatever they might be) and any real tactical differences. At least then, readers would know that there's no real info, rather than making it look like there's nothing different. --[[User:Antistone|Antistone]] 06:11, 31 October 2011 (UTC) | The current page looks like it is almost a direct copy of the regular [[Snarbolax]] page. If no one who's fought these guys wants to do a decent write-up, I think it would be less misleading to have no information than to have an explanation that doesn't mention that silkwing (and other new elements, whatever they might be) and any real tactical differences. At least then, readers would know that there's no real info, rather than making it look like there's nothing different. --[[User:Antistone|Antistone]] 06:11, 31 October 2011 (UTC) | ||
| − | |||
Revision as of 11:41, 31 October 2011
Ok, I know somebody has to have some information on this little freak's fight! Let's get some information, and perhaps throw together a nicely organized guide! Please organize your thoughts here, and we can all put a guide together via teamwork! :D --Kazamh 03:17, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- There are two of them, and a Silkwing flying around every now and then. That is all. And as a note, this page should be renamed to Rabid Snarbolaxes. Magnus 07:05, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- I shall have the name changed this instant! --Kazamh 12:44, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- Since the level is referred to as "Rabid Snarbolax Shadow Lair" in the singualr, the name of the article should also remain singular with a redirect from the plural. --Equinox 14:28, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
The current page looks like it is almost a direct copy of the regular Snarbolax page. If no one who's fought these guys wants to do a decent write-up, I think it would be less misleading to have no information than to have an explanation that doesn't mention that silkwing (and other new elements, whatever they might be) and any real tactical differences. At least then, readers would know that there's no real info, rather than making it look like there's nothing different. --Antistone 06:11, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
