Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chromalisk"
From SpiralKnights
(Created page with 'Can we get a better Virulisk picture? The current one is nice, but it's all blurry and covered in jpeg artifacts. :c ~ ~~~~') |
(→Chromalisks that are not separate: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Can we get a better Virulisk picture? The current one is nice, but it's all blurry and covered in jpeg artifacts. :c ~ [[User:Shoy|Shoy]] 03:30, 26 October 2010 (UTC) | Can we get a better Virulisk picture? The current one is nice, but it's all blurry and covered in jpeg artifacts. :c ~ [[User:Shoy|Shoy]] 03:30, 26 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Chromalisks that are not separate == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Don't have time tonight to figure out what to do with these (maybe we need t1, t2, t3 pics for some to illustrate?), but there isn't actually a bull chromalisk or a deadly virulisk. They're just chromalisks & virulisks only I guess at a higher numbered tier. --[[User:Equinox|Equinox]] 03:26, 23 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:26, 23 March 2011
Can we get a better Virulisk picture? The current one is nice, but it's all blurry and covered in jpeg artifacts. :c ~ Shoy 03:30, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Chromalisks that are not separate
Don't have time tonight to figure out what to do with these (maybe we need t1, t2, t3 pics for some to illustrate?), but there isn't actually a bull chromalisk or a deadly virulisk. They're just chromalisks & virulisks only I guess at a higher numbered tier. --Equinox 03:26, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
