Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chromalisk"
From SpiralKnights
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Can we get a better Virulisk picture? The current one is nice, but it's all blurry and covered in jpeg artifacts. :c ~ [[User:Shoy|Shoy]] 03:30, 26 October 2010 (UTC) | Can we get a better Virulisk picture? The current one is nice, but it's all blurry and covered in jpeg artifacts. :c ~ [[User:Shoy|Shoy]] 03:30, 26 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Salmanders and Tundralisks merely get darker at Tier 3, or at least I think so. --[[User:Zardica|Zardica]] 18:57, 2 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
== Chromalisks that are not separate == | == Chromalisks that are not separate == | ||
| Line 8: | Line 10: | ||
me wanna see t3h dedly virulisk n bul cromalisk-[[User:xPlad|xPlad]] | me wanna see t3h dedly virulisk n bul cromalisk-[[User:xPlad|xPlad]] | ||
:note: intenshunal mispelign ahs intenshunal | :note: intenshunal mispelign ahs intenshunal | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 19:21, 2 September 2011
Can we get a better Virulisk picture? The current one is nice, but it's all blurry and covered in jpeg artifacts. :c ~ Shoy 03:30, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Salmanders and Tundralisks merely get darker at Tier 3, or at least I think so. --Zardica 18:57, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Chromalisks that are not separate
Don't have time tonight to figure out what to do with these (maybe we need t1, t2, t3 pics for some to illustrate?), but there isn't actually a bull chromalisk or a deadly virulisk. They're just chromalisks & virulisks only I guess at a higher numbered tier. --Equinox 03:26, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Can I haz link to pics?
me wanna see t3h dedly virulisk n bul cromalisk-xPlad
- note: intenshunal mispelign ahs intenshunal
