Difference between revisions of "Talk:Snarbolax Coat"
From SpiralKnights
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:::: Even The Dark Briar Barrage should be included, and it is now. | :::: Even The Dark Briar Barrage should be included, and it is now. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Would someone add this to the Triva?: ''The Snarbolax Coat and Cap may have been inspired by this forum post http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/25833'' | ||
Latest revision as of 20:43, 11 November 2012
I'm not sure whether the Barbarous Thorn Blade should be listed under the set. Either that or it should have the Barbarous Thorn shield listed as well. --Vlad 23:09, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
- While aesthetically it does match, I do not believe they should actually be considered "a set", because it was released later on. --Kazamh 23:59, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
- When it was released doesn't change if something can or can't be in a set. Its aesthetics and source are enough to consider it part of the set. Magnus 00:46, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
- This is still ignoring Vlad's point: both or neither the Barbarous sword and shield should be present; especially odd that solely the Sword was chosen as all other sets have the obvious complementary shield. Also, the "set" page along with each individual Snarbolax/Barbarous piece should be likewise edited if this is the case. Volebamus 4 November 2011
- Even The Dark Briar Barrage should be included, and it is now.
Would someone add this to the Triva?: The Snarbolax Coat and Cap may have been inspired by this forum post http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/25833
