Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bomb"
From SpiralKnights
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:There was a "discussion" on the forums some time ago regarding this. See [http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/15993 link]. Current understanding is that the column is useful for sorting purposes & therefore should stay. -[[User:SK Tactics|SK Tactics]] 13:33, 8 August 2011 (UTC) :-) | :There was a "discussion" on the forums some time ago regarding this. See [http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/15993 link]. Current understanding is that the column is useful for sorting purposes & therefore should stay. -[[User:SK Tactics|SK Tactics]] 13:33, 8 August 2011 (UTC) :-) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Splinter Bomb= | ||
| + | The Splinter Bomb has been incorrectly labeled as 3 star in the 2 star section. However the alchemy line suggests it's 2 star. Can somebody check this out? -[[User:Ergot695]] 10:21, 24 April 2013 (unsigned) | ||
Revision as of 16:17, 24 April 2013
Missing Damage Numbers
There are many missing damage numbers, especially after the 05/09/2012 update, with all of the bomb damage values being upped. --AutoFire 16:42, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Page Layout
Since the Abilities column lists the potential status effects in it, do we need a separate column that does the same thing? Seems redundant, especially since the page is somewhat wide already. -Jlh0605 (unsigned)
- There was a "discussion" on the forums some time ago regarding this. See link. Current understanding is that the column is useful for sorting purposes & therefore should stay. -SK Tactics 13:33, 8 August 2011 (UTC) :-)
=Splinter Bomb
The Splinter Bomb has been incorrectly labeled as 3 star in the 2 star section. However the alchemy line suggests it's 2 star. Can somebody check this out? -User:Ergot695 10:21, 24 April 2013 (unsigned)
