Difference between revisions of "Talk:Reviving"
From SpiralKnights
m (Edits designed to prevent people from seeing math: 3,600 bytes. Adding the wrong number to avoid an equation? Priceless.) |
(leave the numbers there, Pauling! It's easier to read equations on the blackboard than it is on the screen, which is why I despise online courses.) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
On a more general note, the layout of this page is a bit confusing all around, and it could use some rearranging love anyway. A more compact summary of costs could go with that. Alas: I do loves me some equations... ;) --[[User:Pauling|Pauling]] 04:25, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | On a more general note, the layout of this page is a bit confusing all around, and it could use some rearranging love anyway. A more compact summary of costs could go with that. Alas: I do loves me some equations... ;) --[[User:Pauling|Pauling]] 04:25, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :For the time being, I can make a table for the cost of revives later today. [[User:Saphykun|Saphykun]] 15:58, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:58, 8 April 2011
The "new" math
I don't think that the list of numbers is correct. It attempts to consolidate all 3 tiers together, but it implies that the jump from 2nd to third revive in tier 1 yields 4*2 = 5. It took me 5 min of standing on spikes in tier 1, but I confirmed that the "new math" is not correct. (The costs in tier 1 per revive are 2, 4, 8, etc- as would be expected)
On a more general note, the layout of this page is a bit confusing all around, and it could use some rearranging love anyway. A more compact summary of costs could go with that. Alas: I do loves me some equations... ;) --Pauling 04:25, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- For the time being, I can make a table for the cost of revives later today. Saphykun 15:58, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
