Difference between revisions of "User:Novaster/Projects"

From SpiralKnights

Jump to: navigation, search
m (gotta look into that rank page again)
m (done with this and that)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
===High Priority===
 
===High Priority===
 
{{Showhide|Highest Priority:|content=
 
{{Showhide|Highest Priority:|content=
*Improve [[Player Rank]] table information. It could be more clear, and some entries are incorrect regarding the arcade vs. prestige vs. HoH.
 
 
 
*Finish area project. [http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/107506 Infobox discussion] and [http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/111949 area page format discussion]
 
*Finish area project. [http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/107506 Infobox discussion] and [http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/111949 area page format discussion]
  
Line 303: Line 301:
 
*Do something about that Danger Mission page.
 
*Do something about that Danger Mission page.
 
:Done: 06 January 2016 (decided to just redirect it due to repeated information in tangential format, created talk page just in case)
 
:Done: 06 January 2016 (decided to just redirect it due to repeated information in tangential format, created talk page just in case)
 +
 +
*Improve [[Player Rank]] table information. It could be more clear, and some entries are incorrect regarding the arcade vs. prestige vs. HoH.
 +
:Done: 13 January 2016, thanks to all those alts from 09 Dec 2015's account endeavor.
 +
 +
*Fix the "knot" of news file redirects for danger missions.
 +
:Done: 13 January 2016. Yes some of them are not true PNGs, but I could not find a source of png. The Google+ account tends to use png in more recent posts. Sorry if the file size vs. jpg quality is super bothersome. Shhhh. If you find a true png source, definitely upload them and source them please. [[:File:Promoart grinchlinassault.jpg|GA file]] continues to be bothersome because it does not fit into the [[news]] image system we all love so much but it is protected (we have [[:File:SpiralKnights News 98-big.png|this file in use]]), but that is okay, because it was uploaded long before we even had the system. But thinking about these factors, it might actually be more worthwhile to stick to the redirects, even though they feel lazy and, well, not "right." The fact the wiki even allows us to functionally redirect them is significant, though.
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 18:41, 13 January 2016

To Do

High Priority

Med Priority

Low Priority

Scrapped

Done

Personal tools