Difference between revisions of "User talk:Charoum"
From SpiralKnights
(→Arguments about articles: new section) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Why do you insist on keeping such a childish description? A page that calls something "cute" and tells readers to ask themselves a silly question is definitely not in line with "Information Central." In a wiki that's poorly written in general, status quo is ''not'' the best solution. —[[User:Heruncle|Heruncle]] 06:08, 20 July 2011 (UTC) | Why do you insist on keeping such a childish description? A page that calls something "cute" and tells readers to ask themselves a silly question is definitely not in line with "Information Central." In a wiki that's poorly written in general, status quo is ''not'' the best solution. —[[User:Heruncle|Heruncle]] 06:08, 20 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Arguments about articles == | ||
| + | |||
| + | If a user has a differing opinion about an article, it's best not to get into an editing war on the article itself. Instead, you need to discuss your differing opinions on the article's talk page. Since this is a matter of difference of opinion, don't leave messages as if it were vandalism/misbehavior rather you should invite discussion so you can talk it out & even get other editors' opinions. --[[User:Equinox|Equinox]] 17:16, 20 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:16, 20 July 2011
Kat
Why do you insist on keeping such a childish description? A page that calls something "cute" and tells readers to ask themselves a silly question is definitely not in line with "Information Central." In a wiki that's poorly written in general, status quo is not the best solution. —Heruncle 06:08, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Arguments about articles
If a user has a differing opinion about an article, it's best not to get into an editing war on the article itself. Instead, you need to discuss your differing opinions on the article's talk page. Since this is a matter of difference of opinion, don't leave messages as if it were vandalism/misbehavior rather you should invite discussion so you can talk it out & even get other editors' opinions. --Equinox 17:16, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
