Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wings"

From SpiralKnights

Jump to: navigation, search
m
m (Reply)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
== Regal Wings ==
 +
 
I'm fairly positive that the picture of the Regal Wings were a screen shot from an ''illegally'' modded version of the game. This [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EoQ6hHRKsN4 YouTube video] suggests it, as well as the fact that the [[Mad Bomber Suit]] (along with its sibling counterparts) is not Armor-Back compatible. Might I say: ''busted''? :) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;→ [[User:Aecarus|<font style="color: #2265FF; font-size: 14px; font-family: Harrington, Tahoma, Arial;">Aecarus</font>]] 20:29, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
 
I'm fairly positive that the picture of the Regal Wings were a screen shot from an ''illegally'' modded version of the game. This [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EoQ6hHRKsN4 YouTube video] suggests it, as well as the fact that the [[Mad Bomber Suit]] (along with its sibling counterparts) is not Armor-Back compatible. Might I say: ''busted''? :) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;→ [[User:Aecarus|<font style="color: #2265FF; font-size: 14px; font-family: Harrington, Tahoma, Arial;">Aecarus</font>]] 20:29, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
 +
 +
:I've taken care of it.  Thanks for the heads up. --[[User:Equinox|Equinox]] 23:03, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:03, 1 December 2011

Regal Wings

I'm fairly positive that the picture of the Regal Wings were a screen shot from an illegally modded version of the game. This YouTube video suggests it, as well as the fact that the Mad Bomber Suit (along with its sibling counterparts) is not Armor-Back compatible. Might I say: busted? :)      → Aecarus 20:29, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

I've taken care of it. Thanks for the heads up. --Equinox 23:03, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Personal tools