Difference between revisions of "Talk:Monster"
From SpiralKnights
Jimbo Jambo (Talk | contribs) (→Monster characters: new section) |
(→Monster characters) |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
There are a couple open discussions on whether or not to add monster NPCs, like Konjuring Kat and Hubert the jelly, to the "Notables" section on their respective monster articles. Since there are a few such characters, and since none of the discussions I've seen have gotten much attention, I figured I'd bring them all here. Should these characters be given space on monster articles instead of having their own articles? (which most of them really don't need, since there's so little information on them) If so, should they go under Notables, or perhaps be given their own "Characters" section? [[User:Jimbo Jambo|Jimbo Jambo]] 19:19, 8 April 2012 (UTC) | There are a couple open discussions on whether or not to add monster NPCs, like Konjuring Kat and Hubert the jelly, to the "Notables" section on their respective monster articles. Since there are a few such characters, and since none of the discussions I've seen have gotten much attention, I figured I'd bring them all here. Should these characters be given space on monster articles instead of having their own articles? (which most of them really don't need, since there's so little information on them) If so, should they go under Notables, or perhaps be given their own "Characters" section? [[User:Jimbo Jambo|Jimbo Jambo]] 19:19, 8 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Maybe a [[NPC]] page could be created that contains these and perhaps all the other NPCs, since none of their pages really have that much info. But that's something that could be determined on a case-by-case basis, character pages with a lot of info could just have a link on the npc page. --[[User:HexZyle|HexZyle]] 14:06, 9 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:06, 9 April 2012
Excuse me, but I was wanting to add the training cubes from the Advanced Training Hall. Where should I put them?--XTUX345 18:57, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- I'd have to say they would fall under construct, but they don't really follow the same weakness/strength pattern. Maybe they should get their own little section near the bottom of the page? Nothing fancy because they're uncommon enemies... but the completionist in me wants to see them listed here. --BlueBead 16:07, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Shouldn't Vanaduke fall under that catagory as well? --Zardica 19:25, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Maybe a seperate page could be made for Shufflebots and Vanaduke? Like the ??? Family? :S --Zardica 18:30, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
What family would the swarm creatures fall under, or would they have their own family? --Kazamh 20:17, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- From what I noticed, it seems the Swarm Seed is weak to piercing and resistant to Shadow, so it might be a fiend - I haven't actually confirmed this with damage bonuses or anything though. But considering how unique The Swarm is, it might aswell have it own family section. --Kakelgis 17:03, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
shouldn't we add Impostoclaus and drones?
Drones
Drones are not part of any monster family. Read this on the patch notes. --Dark-Fantasy 10:50, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
We need more Beasts.
Chromalisks and Wolvers just isn't enough for me. It would be cool to have a Beast unique to Spiral Knights.
Gremlin family
I like that the gremlin series is split up into individual pages on each gremlin type. Before all the gremlins were lumped into 1 page.--SpiralMike 01:12, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Creep Cakes
So......where do Creep Cakes go?
- Large ones deal piercing damage and small ones deal normal damage, so they are somewhat similar to jellies (they use the same model too) BUT they are neutral to all shadow damage... Confectionery Family? But seriously I have no idea. Story-wise they could fall into Fiends family (cupcakes possessed by dark spirits because Dark Matter were used in the process of baking) Merethif 21:29, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, the large ones still do pure normal even in tier 3, they just show a yellow attack windup, probably because it was copypasted from jellies. Anyway, they don't belong to a monster family along with the swarm, drones and Vanaduke. I may as well fix that incorrect placement while I'm at it although someone will inevitably move Vanaduke to some family he doesn't belong in again. ~Katmint 00:20, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- I suppose lost souls would be considered untyped too. I tried to open a discussion on which family they belonged in, but it hasn't gotten any responses yet, so I assumed nobody really cared. Also, what of shufflebots? Jimbo Jambo 03:32, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- Shufflebots are construct, due to their construct UV weakness. Whisps, Shankles, and Lost Souls are all Drones because they are level hazards and drop no rewards, but no type is fine too. Someone should test creep cakes with Slime UVs. --HexZyle 06:52, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- I've just tested Slime UV - no extra damage. Merethif 08:50, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Monster characters
There are a couple open discussions on whether or not to add monster NPCs, like Konjuring Kat and Hubert the jelly, to the "Notables" section on their respective monster articles. Since there are a few such characters, and since none of the discussions I've seen have gotten much attention, I figured I'd bring them all here. Should these characters be given space on monster articles instead of having their own articles? (which most of them really don't need, since there's so little information on them) If so, should they go under Notables, or perhaps be given their own "Characters" section? Jimbo Jambo 19:19, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- Maybe a NPC page could be created that contains these and perhaps all the other NPCs, since none of their pages really have that much info. But that's something that could be determined on a case-by-case basis, character pages with a lot of info could just have a link on the npc page. --HexZyle 14:06, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
