Difference between revisions of "User talk:Trias"
From SpiralKnights
(Vertical align?) |
(→Damage Testing for Argent Peacemaker: re) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I'd prefer to not change the vertical alignment as it makes it harder to read across the table row. Is there a reason why you want this change? --[[User:Equinox|Equinox]] 14:16, 17 July 2011 (UTC) | I'd prefer to not change the vertical alignment as it makes it harder to read across the table row. Is there a reason why you want this change? --[[User:Equinox|Equinox]] 14:16, 17 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I'll revert it for now.[[User:Trias|Trias]] 14:17, 17 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Damage Testing for Argent Peacemaker == | ||
| + | Hi Trias, unsure whether you know this, but OOO is considering possible [http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/34185 changes] to Argent Peacemaker. Would advise not spending too much time testing it now since the data might be invalidated shortly. Btw, why split the "vs monster types" into 6 separate columns instead of the usual 3(weak/neutral/strong)? The table looks kind of weird with the irregular width columns & all. --[[User:SK Tactics|SK Tactics]] 23:32, 29 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | :The split is simply because people were claiming that dual special damage weapons are not working properly. As such I'm gathering the raw data for all 6 families. (No worry, I'm just making notes on regular runs.)[[User:Trias|Trias]] 22:24, 30 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 22:24, 30 November 2011
Vertical align?
I'd prefer to not change the vertical alignment as it makes it harder to read across the table row. Is there a reason why you want this change? --Equinox 14:16, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- I'll revert it for now.Trias 14:17, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Damage Testing for Argent Peacemaker
Hi Trias, unsure whether you know this, but OOO is considering possible changes to Argent Peacemaker. Would advise not spending too much time testing it now since the data might be invalidated shortly. Btw, why split the "vs monster types" into 6 separate columns instead of the usual 3(weak/neutral/strong)? The table looks kind of weird with the irregular width columns & all. --SK Tactics 23:32, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
- The split is simply because people were claiming that dual special damage weapons are not working properly. As such I'm gathering the raw data for all 6 families. (No worry, I'm just making notes on regular runs.)Trias 22:24, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
