Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lancer Knightz (Guild)/Sword Charges Per Minute"
From SpiralKnights
(→User interface increases charge count: thanks) |
(→User interface increases charge count: job well done) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:Thanks for the +6 data. I threw in the other swords too. Send me the lower-CTR data when you get a chance. Thanks! [[User:Vroom|Vroom]] 23:32, 7 November 2013 (UTC) | :Thanks for the +6 data. I threw in the other swords too. Send me the lower-CTR data when you get a chance. Thanks! [[User:Vroom|Vroom]] 23:32, 7 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Nice work. The analysis looks good. [[User:Jdavis|Jdavis]] 17:21, 10 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:21, 10 November 2013
User interface increases charge count
The new "charge bar" user interface element makes it easier to time charges optimally. I'm consistently getting 23 CPM on Acheron and Obsidian Edge now (ASI+6, CTR+6). So we should probably redo the whole table? To start it off, my Obsidian Edge data are:
- +0: 15, 14.5, 15
- +1: 16, 16
- +2: 17, 17
- +3: 18, 18
- +4: 19.5, 19.5
- +5: 21, 21
- +6: 23, 23
Jdavis 14:28, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- I agree. I just measured BTB (23, 23) and GF (15, 15) at CTR+6, ASI+6. Redoing the table makes sense. Unfortunately, I won't be able to get any of my swords below CTR+2. Anyway, will you please redo CIV, WHB, FFlamberge, FRigadoon? Vroom 15:53, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the +6 data. I threw in the other swords too. Send me the lower-CTR data when you get a chance. Thanks! Vroom 23:32, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- Nice work. The analysis looks good. Jdavis 17:21, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
