Difference between revisions of "Talk:Monster"
From SpiralKnights
(Adding my opinion) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: I'd have to say they would fall under construct, but they don't really follow the same weakness/strength pattern. Maybe they should get their own little section near the bottom of the page? Nothing fancy because they're uncommon enemies... but the completionist in me wants to see them listed here. --[[User:BlueBead|BlueBead]] 16:07, 11 June 2011 (UTC) | : I'd have to say they would fall under construct, but they don't really follow the same weakness/strength pattern. Maybe they should get their own little section near the bottom of the page? Nothing fancy because they're uncommon enemies... but the completionist in me wants to see them listed here. --[[User:BlueBead|BlueBead]] 16:07, 11 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Shouldn't Vanduke fall under that catagory as well? --[[User:Zardica|Zardica]] 19:25, 21 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:25, 21 June 2011
Excuse me, but I was wanting to add the training cubes from the Advanced Training Hall. Where should I put them?--XTUX345 18:57, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- I'd have to say they would fall under construct, but they don't really follow the same weakness/strength pattern. Maybe they should get their own little section near the bottom of the page? Nothing fancy because they're uncommon enemies... but the completionist in me wants to see them listed here. --BlueBead 16:07, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Shouldn't Vanduke fall under that catagory as well? --Zardica 19:25, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
