Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gate construction"
From SpiralKnights
Furyhunter (Talk | contribs) (→Stratum Theme Determination: new section) |
Ekkosangen (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
How was the dual-majority theory dis-proven? It seems to be the case in my research as well. --[[User:Furyhunter|Furyhunter]] 06:31, 6 April 2011 (UTC) | How was the dual-majority theory dis-proven? It seems to be the case in my research as well. --[[User:Furyhunter|Furyhunter]] 06:31, 6 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :My research has found gates of Valestone and Luminite to be both beast and slime. The deciding factor to this, as I had witnessed, was the third most prevalent mineral (in this case, Crimsonite and Moonstone). You can view my current research on this [http://www.tinyurl.com/spikni here.] --[[User:Ekkosangen|Ekkosangen]] 16:50, 6 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:50, 6 April 2011
Numbers
There is a section that includes how many minerals are required to make a gate. However, in the past this number scaled automatically depending on the activity of players... now that the gate creation system has changed, we should watch gates for signs of variation. --Pauling 04:42, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, I had just accidentally left that in there and probably edited it to remove them after you'd read the article. I was putting them in when I looked at another gate and noticed it was still variable. --Equinox 15:03, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Stratum Theme Determination
How was the dual-majority theory dis-proven? It seems to be the case in my research as well. --Furyhunter 06:31, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- My research has found gates of Valestone and Luminite to be both beast and slime. The deciding factor to this, as I had witnessed, was the third most prevalent mineral (in this case, Crimsonite and Moonstone). You can view my current research on this here. --Ekkosangen 16:50, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
