Difference between revisions of "User talk:Jdavis/Swords"
From SpiralKnights
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:Aren't they both just five quick strokes, each landing twice on the monster, for a total of 10 damage numbers? [[User:Jdavis|Jdavis]] 22:19, 18 May 2012 (UTC) | :Aren't they both just five quick strokes, each landing twice on the monster, for a total of 10 damage numbers? [[User:Jdavis|Jdavis]] 22:19, 18 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
| − | I'll post a link to a video: [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBhSfa5Xhqw]] [[User:Sederts|Sederts]] 23:50, 18 May 2012 (UTC) | + | I'll post a link to a video: [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBhSfa5Xhqw]] What you described above is the normal combo, NOT the charge. The DVS charge takes forever and is ungainly, while WHB's charge can be quick and effective. [[User:Sederts|Sederts]] 23:50, 18 May 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:53, 18 May 2012
DVS vs. WHB
Hey Bopp, I realized in your comparison of WHB and DVS is unfair. WHB's charge is actually practical against trojans and slow things. It is the ONLY practical cutter line charge. Sederts 21:23, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- explain to me the difference between the WHB and DVS charge--Trying 21:49, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for your interest in improving my guide. I'd also like to know the difference in the charge attacks, if there is one. DVS fans tell me exactly the same thing --- that the charge is actually practical against trojans and slow monsters. Jdavis 23:04, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
The whb is five quick slashes. DVS is a long 10+ hits. Sederts 21:45, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- Aren't they both just five quick strokes, each landing twice on the monster, for a total of 10 damage numbers? Jdavis 22:19, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
I'll post a link to a video: [[1]] What you described above is the normal combo, NOT the charge. The DVS charge takes forever and is ungainly, while WHB's charge can be quick and effective. Sederts 23:50, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
