Difference between revisions of "Talk:Black Kat Cowl"
From SpiralKnights
(a recent edit by Acies) |
(→A recent edit: response to Acies) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
It is not at all obvious that the Book can be bought and sold, as many items in Spiral Knights cannot be. Further, on the forums we deal with many, many questions about how to obtain Black Kat Cowl. So having explicit text on the wiki page can only help. It's not as if the wiki page is overly long, right? [[User:Jdavis|Jdavis]] 01:33, 11 August 2013 (UTC) | It is not at all obvious that the Book can be bought and sold, as many items in Spiral Knights cannot be. Further, on the forums we deal with many, many questions about how to obtain Black Kat Cowl. So having explicit text on the wiki page can only help. It's not as if the wiki page is overly long, right? [[User:Jdavis|Jdavis]] 01:33, 11 August 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Honestly, the note thing is true, however, about the book it is (and really should if it isn't) general knowledge that things when obtained can be traded unless otherwise stated. I do understand that people do constantly ask about the Book of Dark Rituals (I browse the forums a lot) but the problem I see here is that people do ask about a lot of things. I've had plenty of people ask how to obtain this or that and yet we don't have every single page listing that it can be traded. If it's bound, that's a different story. Honestly, if you truly feel the need that it really should be there, feel free to revert my edit. -- [[User:Acies|Acies]] 02:07, 11 August 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::As a compromise, I've added a note at [[Book of Dark Rituals]] saying that it is unbound (since this is not obvious). I have cleaned up the [[Black Kat Cowl]] page to be just about Black Kat Cowl, not Book of Dark Rituals. Let me know if you dislike these edits. :) [[User:Jdavis|Jdavis]] 13:53, 11 August 2013 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:53, 11 August 2013
A recent edit
The text "NOTE" is unnecessary. Everything on the page is a note. In other words: When you read a book, it's not the case that every important fact is marked with "NOTE", right?
It is not at all obvious that the Book can be bought and sold, as many items in Spiral Knights cannot be. Further, on the forums we deal with many, many questions about how to obtain Black Kat Cowl. So having explicit text on the wiki page can only help. It's not as if the wiki page is overly long, right? Jdavis 01:33, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
- Honestly, the note thing is true, however, about the book it is (and really should if it isn't) general knowledge that things when obtained can be traded unless otherwise stated. I do understand that people do constantly ask about the Book of Dark Rituals (I browse the forums a lot) but the problem I see here is that people do ask about a lot of things. I've had plenty of people ask how to obtain this or that and yet we don't have every single page listing that it can be traded. If it's bound, that's a different story. Honestly, if you truly feel the need that it really should be there, feel free to revert my edit. -- Acies 02:07, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
- As a compromise, I've added a note at Book of Dark Rituals saying that it is unbound (since this is not obvious). I have cleaned up the Black Kat Cowl page to be just about Black Kat Cowl, not Book of Dark Rituals. Let me know if you dislike these edits. :) Jdavis 13:53, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
