Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of sets"
From SpiralKnights
FlashbackJon (Talk | contribs) (→Set Links...: new section) |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
You're welcome. [[User:Magnus|Magnus]] 10:59, 3 April 2011 (UTC) | You're welcome. [[User:Magnus|Magnus]] 10:59, 3 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Set Links... == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Clicking on the name of a set simply takes you to this page: this is fairly annoying. In the absence of individual set pages (which might have their uses but is more work and upkeep than is strictly necessary) would it be worthwhile to add an appropriate anchor tag to the [[Template:SKSetEntry]]? I can do it, I just want to make sure it's worth doing. --[[User:FlashbackJon|FlashbackJon]] 17:37, 29 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:37, 29 April 2011
What should go on this page?
This will be a table with info on gear sets. So far my thoughts are:
- Image, of course - Name of set, of course - Items in the set - Star level - Alchemy path (so people can sort and easily compare the different paths if there is an option) - Information about bonuses? (trying to think if there is a good way to do this where it is sortable in a manner that people could find what they're looking for)
--Equinox 03:09, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Scary Skelly
http://wiki.spiralknights.com/File:Scary_Skelly_Back.png http://wiki.spiralknights.com/File:Scary_Skelly_Front.png
You're welcome. Magnus 10:59, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Set Links...
Clicking on the name of a set simply takes you to this page: this is fairly annoying. In the absence of individual set pages (which might have their uses but is more work and upkeep than is strictly necessary) would it be worthwhile to add an appropriate anchor tag to the Template:SKSetEntry? I can do it, I just want to make sure it's worth doing. --FlashbackJon 17:37, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
