Difference between revisions of "Talk:Armor"
From SpiralKnights
m (moved Talk:Armors to Talk:Armor over redirect: Revert to most likely user-searchable keyword) |
(→Template: new section) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Where are the icons coming from? I tried the equipped armor icon, and it's bigger than all the others, but cleaner. --[[User:Skaf|Skaf]] 08:08, 28 November 2010 (UTC) | Where are the icons coming from? I tried the equipped armor icon, and it's bigger than all the others, but cleaner. --[[User:Skaf|Skaf]] 08:08, 28 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Template == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anyone object to switching the table row coding to a template instead? If not, I will make one and then add all the armor that's known on the wiki to this list since there's some missing. --[[User:Equinox|Equinox]] 05:59, 2 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:59, 2 January 2011
Shouldn't we use a template similar to the one in the weapons page? This one: http://wiki.spiralknights.com/Template:ArmorInfo Pupu 06:33, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
The way the weapons page is set up now is kind of ugly, and isn't very easy to navigate. I'm planning on changing it to be like this one. Thoughts? Shango 13:28, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
- I rather like it. I'd go change the swords/guns/bombs page if I had the time. This format is lovely. - Shoy 14:52, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Where are the icons coming from? I tried the equipped armor icon, and it's bigger than all the others, but cleaner. --Skaf 08:08, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
Template
Anyone object to switching the table row coding to a template instead? If not, I will make one and then add all the armor that's known on the wiki to this list since there's some missing. --Equinox 05:59, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
