Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bechamel"
From SpiralKnights
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:No, we aren't. And based on how flamboyant the person is, it's most likely female. Or really really gay. One of those should probably be on the page. [[User:Magnus|Magnus]] 09:31, 24 October 2011 (UTC) | :No, we aren't. And based on how flamboyant the person is, it's most likely female. Or really really gay. One of those should probably be on the page. [[User:Magnus|Magnus]] 09:31, 24 October 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Being gay has nothing to do about being uncertaing about its gender, the adjetive you are looking for it's androgynous. - Poul | ||
Revision as of 01:54, 1 November 2011
Article Issues
Hmm, for some reason it won't show me the edited page when I log out. This could mean that other people can't see the completed page. -Aruceus27, 10/5/11
Yes, I finally got it to work! Enjoy the article everyone =) -Aruceus27, 10/6/11
Are we sure Bechamel is a "he"? -Kurozu 08:55, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- No, we aren't. And based on how flamboyant the person is, it's most likely female. Or really really gay. One of those should probably be on the page. Magnus 09:31, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- Being gay has nothing to do about being uncertaing about its gender, the adjetive you are looking for it's androgynous. - Poul
