Difference between revisions of "User talk:Icytea"

From SpiralKnights

Jump to: navigation, search
m
m (Fancy Pants)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
  
==Page Order==
+
==GM Fancy Pants Things==
Shouldn't page order be (assuming these sections pertain to a given page):
+
This information is super silly pants. But it needs to be right so thanks.
:description
+
:acquisition
+
:recipe
+
:alchemy path
+
:attack(s) (descriptions)
+
:damage
+
:notes
+
:gallery
+
:see also
+
  
?
+
Would it be safe to assume that relevant GM items have armor rear slots if they have the other slots, since that slot was introduced a bit after these pages were made? I think everyone cares about this very deeply. So deeply, that they would be absolutely devastated if information were incorrect. Want more toppings of sarcasm with that? :P -[[User:Novaster|Novaster]] 19:26, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 
+
It doesn't really matter, I plan on going through fixing up the weaponinfo boxes/pages (there's still so many that just say "vendor", ugh) like I did the armor/helmet/shield infoboxes, but, yeah. Weeeeee.
+
 
+
-[[User:Novaster|Novaster]] 16:02, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
+
:I've seen edits from you where you put the damage at the top. But if it doesn't matter you can reorder them later. I change the vendor labels as I edit the damage tables, but it'll take me a while to go through every weapon, if it bothers you too much just do it yourself. --[[User:Icytea|Icytea]] 03:54, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
+
:::well yeah I said I would :P (''I plan on going through fixing up...") -[[User:Novaster|Novaster]] 00:21, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
+

Revision as of 19:26, 1 February 2015

Templated Pages

And they all yelled at me in forum node 106676 about templating pages. But this is really nice and better formatted than what I tried to do previously, and you have my support. -Novaster 15:45, 6 January 2015 (UTC)


GM Fancy Pants Things

This information is super silly pants. But it needs to be right so thanks.

Would it be safe to assume that relevant GM items have armor rear slots if they have the other slots, since that slot was introduced a bit after these pages were made? I think everyone cares about this very deeply. So deeply, that they would be absolutely devastated if information were incorrect. Want more toppings of sarcasm with that? :P -Novaster 19:26, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Personal tools