Difference between revisions of "User talk:Snarbylord"

Revision as of 03:52, 28 October 2015

Hello!

I see you're interested in quantities. Just in case you didn't know about it, the wiki has a few categories that may or may not help with what you're doing. Check out Category:Weapons dealing only Normal damage and similar categories in the Category:Weapons category tree. --Novaster 21:55, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Exploration

Talk:Exploration will be published soon. --Novaster 20:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Acquisition

Just in case you were planning on totally fixing acquisition, don't worry about it - we are totally going to do exactly that very soon. When we start implementing the polished template, feel free to help! Just worried you're about to do a lot of work. --Novaster 02:10, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Delete Tag

Yea, you used the delete tag correctly. Snipe those spam bots! --Novaster 12:59, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

See Also

Been trying to keep these very clean. When you start adding weapons to "see also," it rapidly becomes a matter of opinion and is very hard to keep consistent. Users can use the categories below and/or sort the main item lists to find similar status and attack style items. --Novaster 15:39, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

I added those since all the other Flourish line weapons had the Snarby versions linked in See Also. If they shouldn't be there, then shouldn't we be removing them from the other Flourishes as well? --Snarbylord 15:59, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Oh gosh yes. I only changed the recent edits because of recent changes. --Novaster 16:08, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Weapon Pages

I see you been interesting in Weapon's page. We been working in an acquisition template which would be done soon thx to MissNice's data gathering of Basil. But if you really want to help with page, then you can sort them like this except dont add gallery (for those who have them, leave it) and external link is not that necessary right now. You can put in the "Acquisition" section the information of the page only, the template would be implemented later when all data is gathered. But that in case you would like to help with that. If not you can do any other thing you feel like its better to you :). Thx for fixing those See Also out of dated --Hikaru 06:05, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Image Uploads

It is extremely important to maintain file naming consistency. Could you upload a 180x180 picture of Herex from A New Threat? --Novaster 23:06, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Above response was a knee-jerk reaction to general uploading protocol. Coincidentally, the relevant gallery names were messed up due to my sleepy edits. I have fixed them now to be truly consistent with other NPC overworld file names. Would you mind uploading (for a third time :P) the ideal Herex pic for A New Threat? -Novaster 14:44, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Alright, fixed now. Should I fix the name of "Monster-Herex.png" too? ...How many images of Herex do we have floating around now? --Snarbylord 16:25, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Not sure what to do about that image, I'd just leave it alone for now. We'll deal with it when we get to monsters vs. individual pages. Searching for herex under files should reveal any files if they were named properly. --Novaster 16:31, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

The Dark Harvest gate map

It's looking like it might be different depending on some currently unknown factor. It was definitely poison for my rank yesterday in the clockwork tunnels. Right now it's poison tunnels and shock keep for me. --Novaster 15:04, 24 October 2015 (UTC) So, I might have found a pattern. Enter data you find here please. We can keep track of days through edit history. This is just a rough list for now while we try to determine the factor(s). --Novaster 15:16, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Monster Redirects

Oh oh, if you're going to do those, please add [[Category:Monsters]] to the redirect page :) --Novaster 23:50, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Yes those gremlin redirects are much better thank you. --Novaster 03:52, 28 October 2015 (UTC)