Difference between revisions of "Talk:Grouping"
From SpiralKnights
m (→Forums: new section) |
m (→Forums: found more discussion about the "set" issue.) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== Forums == | == Forums == | ||
| − | + | *[http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/38858 Contextual combinations/preferences are not sets] | |
| − | [http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/107260 | + | *[http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/99359 Many groupings are "made up"] |
| + | *[http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/107260 Infobox set display discussion] | ||
| + | *[http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/108709#comment-985411 Sets can be difficult to "officially" define] | ||
Revision as of 15:28, 3 March 2016
This page
It's very um...unofficial. There has been some minor feedback on the forums regarding "well what is a set?" but not much progress on what we should DO about it. So I'm just gonna put my foot down based on what I've seen so far so we can start walking. I wouldn't be opposed to merging "family" into "collection," but I feel that the difference is...distinct enough.-Novaster 04:00, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- Yep, fused them. -Novaster 19:41, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- Unfused - I think it's finally worked out. There's too many items and too much opinion! -Novaster 21:09, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Terminology and sincere organization effort
Moved "Collection" to "Grouping" because "grouping" is an even looser term, freeing up "collection" for specifics. "Collection" is one of those "hot" words that is used in advertising, so it's fitting for promotions (collect them all! Gotta catch 'em all!). Now this "Grouping" page will explain the varieties of groupings. In addition, a subpage system that is managed in Category:Groupings will keep track of these groupings while not confusing each grouping with wayward colloquial terms. --Novaster 15:04, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
