Difference between revisions of "User talk:Zenihdrol"
From SpiralKnights
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==RE: It is unnecessary to add the family and damage resistances when he is never fought== | ==RE: It is unnecessary to add the family and damage resistances when he is never fought== | ||
| − | Yup, I had noticed about it the first time that I was in the battle against him, but by that logic [[Razwog]], the [[Collector]] or [[Seerus]] should to have the family and resistances damages in their articles too, I think that it is ok without adding it (in my opinion) '''[[User:Onox792|Sir-Onox]] 00:12, 10 June 2014''' | + | *Yup, I had noticed about it the first time that I was in the battle against him, but by that logic [[Razwog]], the [[Collector]] or [[Seerus]] should to have the family and resistances damages in their articles too, I think that it is ok without adding it (in my opinion) '''[[User:Onox792|Sir-Onox]] 00:12, 10 June 2014''' |
| + | |||
| + | *Exactly! That is how I see it :) '''[[User:Onox792|Sir-Onox]] 00:41, 10 June 2014''' | ||
Revision as of 00:40, 10 June 2014
Thanks for taking care of the stats images on those shields.
It's a little thank-you and although it doesn't mean a lot those have been on my list of things to do whenever I get around to it. So thank you very much!
RE: It is unnecessary to add the family and damage resistances when he is never fought
- Yup, I had noticed about it the first time that I was in the battle against him, but by that logic Razwog, the Collector or Seerus should to have the family and resistances damages in their articles too, I think that it is ok without adding it (in my opinion) Sir-Onox 00:12, 10 June 2014
- Exactly! That is how I see it :) Sir-Onox 00:41, 10 June 2014
