Talk:List of sets

What should go on this page?

This will be a table with info on gear sets. So far my thoughts are:

- Image, of course - Name of set, of course - Items in the set - Star level - Alchemy path (so people can sort and easily compare the different paths if there is an option) - Information about bonuses? (trying to think if there is a good way to do this where it is sortable in a manner that people could find what they're looking for)

--Equinox 03:09, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

I'd like to know how set bonuses show up in-game and what criteria are required for a set to be a set. Perhaps that would better belong as a separate non-list page, but we really need more information on sets in general. --Tathar 02:44, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

I think displaying the ingame box of armor set stats would make sense. For example, the Ash Tail set:

Though it would require a lot of work, it gives more information and is clearer than the current setup. Besides the stats for individual items need to be redone as well, a lot of them are outdated. --Striator 04:35, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Scary Skelly

http://wiki.spiralknights.com/File:Scary_Skelly_Back.png http://wiki.spiralknights.com/File:Scary_Skelly_Front.png

You're welcome. Magnus 10:59, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Set Links...

Clicking on the name of a set simply takes you to this page: this is fairly annoying. In the absence of individual set pages (which might have their uses but is more work and upkeep than is strictly necessary) would it be worthwhile to add an appropriate anchor tag to the Template:SKSetEntry? I can do it, I just want to make sure it's worth doing. --FlashbackJon 17:37, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Sure, go for it. --Equinox 00:40, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Resorting

I'm afraid I was trolled halfway through resorting and fixing this page, and lost over half an hour worth of work. I'll be back to complete the resortment of this page.

If you haven't noticed, I'm sorting the sets in order of alchemy paths, in the actual order that they are alchemised. The current "sort by alchemy path" option doesn't actually sort it to this degree, and we already have a "sort alphabetically" option so there is no need for the data to be in that order.

While meticulously sorting it like this I picked up a couple spelling and missing data errors, if you wish to have it reverted, let me know, because there is more than just resortment edits in there. --HexZyle 08:05, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Finished the fine sort-by-alchemical-paths work that HexZyle started. I've followed the List of Alchemy Paths in laying out the sets alphabetically, then by level progression (then alphabetically...), with a few exceptions:

• Left Almirian Crusader after Azure Guardian in the Cobalt set, for visual cohesion.
• Placed the -break sets one after the other (thematic).--Scribo 15:23, 8 July 2012 (UTC)