User talk:Acies

Hey! Thank you very much for adding that image for the Grinchlin Stalker, if you find other image for the Grinchlin Thwacker/Scorcher with better quality (and to fix my grammar when i wrote the article, i'm sorry) i would be very grateful :)

-Sir Onox

gunner update innacuracy

i have corrected a minor inaccuracy in your edit. the page is not a candidate for speedy deletion, but a golden drop of truth

Image tags

Just in case you haven't noticed it yet, image tags need to be in the fancy brackets{} and not parentheses(). --Equinox 22:34, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

As far as I can see Vial Belt.png uploaded just fine, and is visible on the Pickups page. What you may have seen was the wiki's old habit of taking forever to get up to speed with a newly uploaded image. --Lithium31337 05:25, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Battle Sprites

To be completely honest, I was trying to get images of about all the evolutions and their ultimate variants rather than just a huge group picture of all of them, luckily after constant waiting, I was able to get nearly everything. Midnight-Violet 21:11, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Request Image

Hello Acies, i saw that you took a perfect image for the mission interface The Gauntlet: http://wiki.spiralknights.com/The_Gauntlet

My request is: Can you do the same for the ancient generator and crossing the chasm article? Many thanks!

http://wiki.spiralknights.com/The_Ancient_Generator

http://wiki.spiralknights.com/Crossing_the_Chasm

Sure, I'll get them up tonight. --Acies 16:35, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Done and Done, if you have anymore that need uploading, let me know. --Acies 07:33, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks again, if i do more rank missions articles like The Silent Legion, i will ask you again ^^ Also, can you add the three mission interface of the Black Kat event for http://wiki.spiralknights.com/Kataclysmic_Confrontation ? - Sir Onox

Sure, I'll do it later today, currently running the Clockworks for Black Kats. --Acies 17:10, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Alrighty, I added all of them, I'm also doing all the others ones just so they're there whenever you get to them. --Acies 21:05, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Sorry for bother again, can you upload The Silent Legion interface image? Thanks! :P - Sir Onox

Doing it right now, sorry, was just finishing up my Kat hunting for the event. --Acies 16:21, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for uploading all these mission interfaces, i really like to write his articles. if you can upload more in the future (In Cold Blood, The Vile Engine, Terminal Meltdown, etc..) I'll be glad to make it - Sir Onox

I have every Mission Card ready to be uploaded tomorrow. (tired right now) --Acies 08:23, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi again Acies! Can you upload the Mission Interface images for the four danger missions? I'm going to improve the danger mission articles these days. Thanks! - Sir Onox

Hi Acies, can you upload the Mission Interface images for the Shroud of the Apocrea and The Dark Harvest? Many thanks again! - Sir Onox

Vog Cub

Can i re-add the vog cub for historical purposes? I forgot to add the obsolete tag. :/ --DragonFaku

I can't really say for historical purposes. I've seen a lot of people try to add it for historical purposes but it just flat out isn't in the game nor has it even been. Vog Cubs have never existed in the game. If there was a point where it was in game aside from the promotional trailer, that would be a different story like with the Golden Trojan or Golden Gun Puppy, they both existed during Private Beta and were removed later. Vog Cub doesn't follow this rule hence it shouldn't be noted. --Acies 23:56, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

The Third Troika

When you recovered the page, you removed the disclaimer of it being its non-official name. Was this intentional? --HexZyle 12:41, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

No, it wasn't. I didn't realize that Oceanic‎ removed that section from the original page since all I did was copy over the changes he made back to The Third Troika and replaced the unannounced name with The Third Troika as it wouldn't let me revert it to the previous changes for whatever reason. I'll add it back in here in a second. --Acies 20:12, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Clockworks Bros

Yo, you edit our page called: "Clockworks Bros" it is not a guild!!! It is a spiral knight videos page we made. please don't change it again. I know your trying to help :) -Ssosme

Then isn't it just YouTube advertising or something? Wouldn't a better place for it be on a blog or something so that people could follow it and receive updates? --HexZyle 06:08, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Adding Categories

Make sure to mark your edits as minor, if you're doing a mass amount of them. Makes filtering through the Recent Changes list and such easier for others, thanks :) --HexZyle 05:59, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Severely Lacking

My tricorder finds your swag levels extremely low. You should be careful.... low swag is dire indeed. -- Wombatlad

RE:stats images

Hey mate. No problem :) I noticed they were missing and figured it was on someone's to-do list, and I had some free time. Glad I could help! Zenihdrol 07:37, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Uh

Why are you undoing source links?

Source Links are not needed for everything aside from a few-cases such as the Iron Sets and the Total War promotions. I had no intention of actually removing the sources from that. I just checked the history and re-added the original obtainment method. --Acies 09:49, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

ah okay, some of those were wrong and broken links, so be careful please. I've got precise source links for the individual item requirements (which took a little while to find, and are different per item).

Serene Things

Do you think the serene items (and dangerous brig/draped) need their own pages, or are they fine where I've put them?

Communication

-I noticed you've removed the root tags for several of my animations. Could you please post on my usertalk page when and why you do this? Cause I don't want to spend more time later making them if you're just going to take them down (which you shouldn't do in general, because many players have asked me over the years for such a thing, and now that I've done it, even more are asking for more...so I do it for everything I see now, as fast as I can). Anyway, just respect my time as I respect yours - cause like I said, don't wanna spend time making something that will be deleted later. IMO: Unattached and Overworld are needed, especially for things like the grand topper and auras that leave trailing effects. I won't do any more inspect windows, those are large and don't really reveal anything more than the unattached does, besides clipping and special circumstances like the leafy aura (which sticks parts of itself on your head). -Novaster 05:15, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Your Edits

Could you be a little less..."scalding" or "mean" with your edit comments, please? We're all just trying to make the wiki a better place, after all. Several people wished to have the root functional gear for the costumes be the oldest form, so cobalt isn't wrong - it is correct (as it is the exact same "form"). For the sake of consistency across costume pages, the Spiral Crescent (functional gear) Helm is of course better. So yes, spiral crescent is better now...but it's hardly an "apple and orange" difference. Just be nicer with how you word your edit comments, please. Novaster 16:07, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

I don't exactly how it was Scalding or even Mean if the message wasn't exactly directed at anyone specifically but at a piece of information that I thought was wrongly put there. I probably could have worded it better, I agree, but I apologize. --Acies 16:19, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Icon Recolors

I uploaded a few icons for table experimentation (it involved page width for certain browsers) - anyway, these are RGB, and when I uploaded them I tagged them with a general temporary "needs update" tag to find 'em all later. If you're feelin like working on those icon recolors again, the ones with that tag would be a great start, IMO. I'd look into them, but I don't have a good process in place yet. Novaster 16:46, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

I'll help with some whenever I figure out how to correctly get the color-coding working as spot on as it can. A lot of my notes were all over the place hence I have yet to update the generalized Icon topic about my method. As such, I'm still looking into it and it has yet to die off. I plan on going back into conversion methods later on. Specifically after the charity event. --Acies 17:10, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Bulleting

Hi, Glacies. Please see this forum thread, which is motivated by our recent edits to Acheron. Jdavis 21:25, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Images: Name Changes

Found this page via "what links here" during a format project for Battle Sprite icons - deletion tags.

Hello, I decided to fix the names for the battle sprite icons. Most "icons" on the wiki have "icon" in the file name, in order to make tables easier to manage and so on. For whatever reason, battle sprite icons were not uploaded this way! Feel free to check this page for icons with consistent names, and replace the "bad filename" icons on your page if you wish (it makes it easier for Clotho/other Wiki Admins to go through and delete images with bad file names if no pages link to Deletion Candidates). Have fun playing! -Novaster 00:16, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Item types at the top of pages

Please don't undo work like this. It's useful work that users have asked for. And it's not repetitive information, actually. Yes, the image is usually a dead giveaway, but not always. This information is NOT readily available on the page in text form either - it's down near the category section, sure, but not all users look there, and that's inconvenient anyway. Contrary to your initial edit statement: Sometimes it's ("it" being what the weapon type is) in the description, but not always. Sometimes it's in the attack description, but not always. Sure, the type is right there at the top...if you're looking at the page's coding. It doesn't show up in the actual page display, but it does register category. Wiki-wide, my edits make these pages more consistent. Page format would be like it is for costumes, accessories, all materials (like the Beast Scale for example), and so on. At the top of those pages, they've always said what the item type is is right away. As an editor and a user, I've always appreciated that. I'll be re-doing these edits, and please don't undo them again. I'd appreciate it if they were implemented for older weapon items too, but I just don't have time for that right now.

P.S. Putting the information on physical appearance in the "notes" section (instead of at the top) is a better move, yes. That style was bleedover from the costume edits a lot of us did over the summer, particularly of the recolor pages, and isn't as formal as it could be. One day when I have a lot of time and nothing important IRL to do, I'll go through and make those costume pages more consistent regarding this style. -Novaster 15:30, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Interestingly, the spacing for Weaponinfo vs. Armorinfo at the top of the pages is different. There's some sort of hiccup, at least for firefox, regarding this spacing. If you could figure out what's causing that, and fix the weaponinfo template accordingly, that would be great. I hope it's just my browser being stupid, so no fixing would be needed. Here is an example of what I'm talking about. -Novaster 15:56, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Decided to bring the subject to the forums. I usually do this, but didn't this time because I thought I was doing consistency edits. Anyway, here is the link to the node.